Public Review Issue: Use abstract scenarios
Issue from filestage Public Review:
General message of this chapter: Use abstract scenarios!
**Comment: This is problematic as exchangeability of abstract level scenarios will be very limited, at least initially. Most simulation providers and scenario libraries currently rely on concrete and logical scenario execution. The support of abstract level OSC2 scenarios requires an "OSC2 Implementation", which is reponsible for creating/identifying those concrete scenarios.
The use case of creating and exchanging concrete/logical scenario should be adressed in this document, as this is a major requirement for the standard. I believe this is true not only short term but also long term. We're part of the Simulation domain of ASAM and a simulation run is only possible for a concrete scenario. A standard should enable the exchange of such scenarios between different parties.**
Provided by @mkluge
@rosenberg i think this is your document. Could you take a look at it and provide an answer. I will copy it to filestage than. Thanks